Sunday, October 23, 2016

One Take of an Event: Steven and James Play Racquetball


Overall response (2-3 paragraphs):
In 2-3 paragraphs, write an overall response to your film: Were you successful at achieving what you set out to achieve? What are you proud of? What would you do differently if you could remake this piece? What did you learn? 

            I really enjoyed making this film, and I feel like I learned a lot of things that need to be thought through before trying to create something like this. I went in to the creation of the project having carefully prepared my beat list, and knowing that beat list pretty well. Of course, under the circumstances, I also felt prepared to stray from the beat list pretty significantly as needed. However, what I was not prepared for was knowing how to work with the given setting, and knowing how best to frame the beats that I had planned. These were the two biggest challenges I perceived during filming. After filming, as I was editing/choosing which segment of my footage to use, I realized that I didn’t get as many different angles as I would have liked, and that there were frequent/repeated moments where I lost track of what I was following because I became more focused on avoiding the ball and players than on keeping something interesting in the shot.
            Despite these challenges, there are a lot of things I’m quite happy with in this film. Overall, I think I did a good job of following the action, and making it so that the audience could understand what was generally going on. There are also several beats, movements, and actions that I’m happy with (such as when Steven returns and James falls trying to get the ball, when I follow the ball as it rolls towards me on the floor, and when James prepares to serve a couple of the times). There are a couple of compositions I like, such as when James is on the floor and when I get a sort of brief over the shoulder shot of James. Additionally, I’m very happy with the people I got to participate in the film. They were fun and engaging.
            However, of course there are several things I wish I had done better. First, I wish I had been able to avoid having any moments of downtime where I got lost in what I was following. This was very tricky with the space limitations and I never really managed to get it down. Second, I wish I had been able to get more angles (from the front of the room looking back, closer shots, and more shots that prominently featured both players. Again, this was tricky due to the space and nature of the action, and I didn’t really get it down. Third, I wish I had managed to get prettier compositions. This is something I could have spent more time planning, but really didn’t even think about until the end of filming when it was too late for me to perfect the skill. Finally, there are a couple of technical things I’m disappointed in. There were a couple specks on the lens (or possible the sensor) the entire time. I cleaned the lens immediately before filming, so I’m really not sure what happened, but I wish I had at least noticed these imperfections in the display before I finished filming so I could have tried to get some footage without them.

Briefly answer the following:
What, specifically, did you want to communicate? Were you successful? Why? Why not?

I wanted to communicate the tension of the game of racquetball—the suspense that comes as the two players play a point and we (the audience) don’t know who will win the point. I also wanted to characterize the people playing, at least a little bit. I think I was successful because everyone I showed it to said they at least felt some drama. They also all seemed to enjoy the “characters,” so I think that’s good. I think in some ways the drama could have been a lot higher, so I could have improved in that area, by possibly getting closer to the players to give a better reading of their facial expressions as they played.

How, specifically, did you try to say this? What visual elements, techniques, etc. did you use?

The biggest one, of course, was movement. I tried to follow the players as they moved to reach the ball, and their sporadic and quick movements gave a sense of urgency and excitement. I also tried to depict the space in a way that gave a sense of what it felt like to be in that tight room with two people moving around quickly. One thing that turned out nicely that I didn’t play was color. James was wearing red and Steven was wearing blue, which provided a nice contrast between them.

What did you learn about storytelling:

I learned that it is very difficult to tell a story with characters very engagingly if you can’t get very close to them to read and depict their facial expressions. However, another thing I learned is that if the situation is fairly obvious, that can be a big supplement to helping the story along, especially if other factors are unchangeable. In this case, everyone generally understands how racquetball is played, and that each player is trying to win each point. This really helped. I also learned that if characters are moving around with purpose, there is always something to look at, and that those details can be choreographed in a way that no cuts need to be made.

Working with actors and getting performance:

Obviously, I didn’t really direct actors this time, but I did learn that Steven and James are very friendly and helpful and nice to work with.

Blocking — camera and actors:

It can be very difficult to capture big blocking movements in a visually pleasing way without having them choreographed beforehand. In this case, it led to my shots generally being overly wide and kind of ugly and boring. This is something I will be sure to avoid in my next film by using a nice and purposeful variety of wide, medium, and close-up shots.

Visuals — composition, framing, visual elements:

Having all white walls is not very friendly to using a lot of visual elements, unless they are very purposefully contrasted with something with more detail. I also relearned that wide shots can be especially difficult to frame in aesthetically pleasing ways. However, fortunately, movement is often enough to keep the audience engaged, which is something that really benefited my project.

Design & Art Direction:  

Again, all white walls with no details other than the people in the shot can be good, but it has to be framed very exactly, which was very difficult under these circumstances.

The Production Process — collaboration with crew, the logistics of making this piece:
                  
Once we got to the courts, everything went incredibly (miraculously, even) smoothly. However, as usual, I forgot some important things until the very last minute (specifically, I forgot to find racquets until a couple hours before shooting), which created a lot of unneeded stress.

What was it like to watch your film with an audience? Did they understand it? Miss the point? Why did they respond the way they did?  

Actually, watching my film with an audience was a really nice experience. Everyone really seemed to enjoy it. More than that, they seemed engaged, and able to follow what was going on. There were certainly lulls (especially toward the beginning), but overall no one seemed to lost, bored, or annoyed. I think they responded the way they did partially because they knew the people involved, which may have been unfair. (However, I did show the film to some people who didn’t know Steven and James before class and they really seemed to enjoy it and the characters as well.) I also think they responded well because I was, for the most part, able to stay focused on the event and its details with only a few lost moments. Additionally, there was at least some variety in the shots, which kept enjoyment up as well.

Other observations:

This was a really good and fun exercise. My main fear—the safety of the camera—ended up not being a problem. Of course, it did cause me to miss some nice beats and shots, but I’m happy I was able to protect the camera and lens even if that meant a little sacrifice.


However, I definitely learned from doing this why racquet sports are shot from one wide angle without much on-court action (unless it’s shot from far away with a long lens). If I were to do this assignment again, I think I would pick something less risky. Hopefully this wouldn’t require me to sacrifice intensity, drama, or fun.

No comments:

Post a Comment